Seth v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the implied consent statute permits warrantless chemical testing
• holding that the implied consent statute permits warrantless chemical testing
• stating standard of review for issues of law is de novo
• “The Rules [of Professional Conduct] may not be used for tactical purposes to disqualify prosecutors where no realistic likelihood of conflict appears.”
• “[U]under Delaware law the police can require a suspect to submit to testing without that person’s consent.”
• “even if the officer had violated the implied consent law, any argument to exclude the evidence is irrelevant. Section 2750(a) eliminates any defense to admissibility not implicating the Fourth Amendment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).