Utah Supreme Court· 10/7/1997

Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp. v. Utah State Tax Commission

Citations

953 P.2d 435
327 Utah Adv. Rep. 38
1997 Utah LEXIS 93
1997 WL 613009

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding tax commission had “continuing jurisdiction to enter an order on a request for reconsideration even after the request ha[d] been deemed denied under section 63-46b-13(3)(b)”
applying an amendment retroactively because it was a “clarifying amendment . . . to a procedural statute”
applying an amendment retroactively because it was a \clarifying amendment ... to a procedural statute\
applying an amendment retroactively because it was a “clarifying amendment . . . to a procedural statute”
\Section 59-1-601's grant of jurisdiction to the district court ... effectively eliminates the Commission's role whenever one of the parties chooses to seek review under that section.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zimmerman, Stewart, Zimmerman'S, Howe, Durham, Stewart'S

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.