Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp. v. Utah State Tax Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding tax commission had “continuing jurisdiction to enter an order on a request for reconsideration even after the request ha[d] been deemed denied under section 63-46b-13(3)(b)”
• applying an amendment retroactively because it was a “clarifying amendment . . . to a procedural statute”
• applying an amendment retroactively because it was a \clarifying amendment ... to a procedural statute\
• applying an amendment retroactively because it was a “clarifying amendment . . . to a procedural statute”
• \Section 59-1-601's grant of jurisdiction to the district court ... effectively eliminates the Commission's role whenever one of the parties chooses to seek review under that section.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).