D. Utah· 5/19/2014
Evans v. Utah
Citations
- 21 F. Supp. 3d 1192
- 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69177
- 2014 WL 2048343
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that this factor accounts for “the amount of 22 money requested in relation to the seriousness of the defendant’s conduct, whether large sums of 23 money are involved, and whether the recovery sought is proportional to the harm caused by 24 defendant’s conduct”
- stating that this factor accounts for “the amount of 22 money requested in relation to the seriousness of the defendant’s conduct, whether large sums of 23 money are involved, and whether the recovery sought is proportional to the harm caused by 24 1 defendant’s conduct”
- discussing the confusion resulting from Utah’s marriage ban being enjoined and then subsequently reinstated
- granting request for stay pending appeal despite factors weighing against it
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kimball
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court· 2015-06-26· cited 955×
- Caspar v. SnyderE.D. Michigan· 2015-01-15· cited 32×
- SWEPI, LP v. Mora CountyD. New Mexico· 2015-01-19· cited 17×
- Campaign for Southern Equality v. BryantS.D. Mississippi· 2014-11-25· cited 15×
- Campaign for Southern Equality v. Phil BryaFifth Circuit· 2014-12-04· cited 11×
- Pidgeon v. ParkerS.D. Texas· 2014-08-28· cited 10×
- Marie v. MoserD. Kansas· 2014-11-04· cited 9×
- Campaign for Southern Equality v. Phil BryaFifth Circuit· 2014-12-10
- State of New Hampshire v. Christina FaySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2020-12-02
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-24· cited 6,491×
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 5,659×
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 4,825×
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court· 1923-06-04· cited 3,363×
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court· 1981-04-29· cited 2,376×
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 1,809×
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 1,521×
- Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 1,452×
- Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 1,333×
- Zablocki v. RedhailSupreme Court· 1978-01-18· cited 1,224×
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleurSupreme Court· 1974-01-21· cited 995×
- United States v. WindsorSupreme Court· 2013-06-26· cited 647×
- Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 621×
- Heideman v. South Salt Lake CityTenth Circuit· 2003-11-04· cited 509×
- Schrier v. University of ColoradoTenth Circuit· 2005-10-31· cited 502×
- American Civil Liberties Union of Ill. v. AlvarezSeventh Circuit· 2012-05-08· cited 304×
- RoDa Drilling Co. v. SiegalTenth Circuit· 2009-01-20· cited 297×
- Awad v. ZiriaxTenth Circuit· 2012-01-10· cited 244×
- O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal v. AshcroftTenth Circuit· 2004-11-12· cited 237×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.