Skip to main content
· 2/20/1974

Okland Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission

Citations

  • 520 P.2d 208
  • 1974 Utah LEXIS 528

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • amendment dealing with “clarification or amplification as to how the law should have been understood” prior to the amendment should be applied retroactively
  • amendment dealing with \clarification or amplification as to how the law should have been understood\ prior to the amendment should be applied retroactively
  • the court refused to evaluate a worker’s compensation claim under an amended statute which extended the period for compensation to an injured employee, but instead applied the law that existed at the time of the employee's accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crockett, Henriod, Ellett, Tuckett, Callister

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.