Skip to main content
· 3/8/2012

Darvish v. Labor Commission Appeals Board

Citations

  • 2012 UT App 68
  • 273 P.3d 953
  • 703 Utah Adv. Rep. 11
  • 2012 WL 748566
  • 2012 Utah App. LEXIS 70

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the UADA “was modeled after Title VII” so “the substantial body of federal case law interpreting Title VII is useful” in interpreting the UADA (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Voros, Orme, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.