Idaho Supreme Court· 10/10/1980
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 618 P.2d 759
- 101 Idaho 581
- 1980 Ida. LEXIS 510
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reiterating Moore and its reliance on Williams for the proposition that hearsay evidence is admissible at sentencing through the PSI report and cross-examination is only required where oral testimony is presented
- district court has broad discretion in determining what evidence is to be admitted at sentencing hearing
- district court has broad discretion in determining what evidence is to be admitted at sentencing hearing
- strict rules of evidence as applied during the guilt phase of a trial do not apply to the sentencing process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bakes, Bistline, Donaldson, Shepard, McFadden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-01-10· cited 601×
- State v. BurdettIdaho Court of Appeals· 2000-03-08· cited 398×
- State v. CreechIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 170×
- State v. PizzutoIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-01-15· cited 162×
- Sivak v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1986-11-19· cited 125×
- State v. SivakIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-08-15· cited 124×
- State v. FainIdaho Supreme Court· 1989-04-04· cited 98×
- Holmes v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 1983-02-02· cited 71×
- State v. BallardIdaho Supreme Court· 1988-09-08· cited 57×
- State v. LackNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-07-06· cited 53×
- State v. McGonigalIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-11-23· cited 46×
- State v. GainIdaho Court of Appeals· 2004-01-21· cited 40×
- Peltier v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-02-27· cited 38×
- State v. MattesonIdaho Supreme Court· 1993-04-19· cited 36×
- State v. FlowersIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-03-17· cited 34×
- State v. WilkinsIdaho Supreme Court· 1994-02-08· cited 31×
- Schmidt v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 1982-06-29· cited 28×
- State v. WerslandIdaho Supreme Court· 1994-04-15· cited 27×
- State v. WilliamsIdaho Court of Appeals· 1994-07-20· cited 20×
- State v. SanwickUtah Supreme Court· 1986-01-30· cited 18×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1949-06-06· cited 2,766×
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 734×
- United States v. GraysonSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 708×
- United States v. BenzSupreme Court· 1931-01-05· cited 503×
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court· 1882-01-18· cited 340×
- People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court· 1959-12-31· cited 247×
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-11-22· cited 199×
- Miller v. AderholdSupreme Court· 1933-02-06· cited 132×
- State v. LindquistIdaho Supreme Court· 1979-01-11· cited 97×
- Spriggs v. State Board of Law ExaminersSupreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 92×
- Nathaniel Vincent v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1964-11-04· cited 85×
- Goddard v. OrdwaySupreme Court· 1880-04-26· cited 80×
- State v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court· 1969-05-08· cited 65×
- People v. McAllisterCalifornia Supreme Court· 1940-05-27· cited 62×
- Basset v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1870-01-24· cited 60×
- Essling v. BrubacherSupreme Court· 1972-10-24· cited 60×
- In re WimbsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1966-12-16· cited 36×
- Oxman v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1945-04-23· cited 35×
- State v. PedrazaIdaho Supreme Court· 1980-08-05· cited 33×
- State v. TillmanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1972-03-04· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.