Ericsson, Inc. v. Harris Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that reconstructing a market to account for the infringing products can support a lost-profits argument
• requiring patentee to show “that ‘but for’ infringement, it would have sold its product at a higher price”
• requiring price erosion theory to account for similarities, but allowing for differences, between the benchmark product and the infringed product and their markets
• admitting accountant testimony on lost profits when accountant’s opinions were independently supported by testimonial and documentary evidence
• upholding price erosion' damages using benchmark of similar product with one' technological difference, ' produced by the same company, and sold in a similarly competitive market
• permitting price erosion damages which assumed the markets “were totally inelastic” where “the unique market conditions . . . would not have resulted in decreased sales at an increased price”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Poly-America, L.P. v. Gse Lining Technology, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2004-09-14· cited 81×
• Power Mosfet Technologies, L.L.C. v. Siemens AG
  Federal Circuit· 2004-08-17· cited 79×
• Georgetown Rail Equipment Co. v. Holland L.P.
  Federal Circuit· 2017-08-01· cited 66×
• Wechsler v. MacKe International Trade, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2007-05-18· cited 53×
• Geo M. Martin Co. v. Alliance MacHine Systems International LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2010-08-20· cited 46×
• Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2015-11-16· cited 22×
• Hearing Components, Inc. v. Shure Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-04-01· cited 20×
• Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Synthes (U.S.A.)
  W.D. Tennessee· 2006-09-28· cited 17×
• Rosco, Inc. v. Mirror Lite Co.
  E.D. New York· 2007-08-06· cited 13×
• KEG Technologies, Inc. v. Laimer
  N.D. Georgia· 2006-06-08· cited 10×
• Brumfield v. Ibg LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2024-03-27· cited 10×
• Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-03-02· cited 8×
• Engineered Products Co. v. Donaldson Co., Inc.
  N.D. Iowa· 2004-04-13· cited 8×
• Honeywell International Inc. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2004-06-02· cited 7×
• Igt v. Alliance Gaming Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-12-17· cited 6×
• Precision Fabrics Grp., Inc. v. Tietex Int'l, Ltd.
  D. South Carolina· 2018-02-25· cited 6×
• Tinnus Enters., LLC v. Telebrands Corp.
  E.D. Texas· 2019-03-15· cited 6×
• Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Abbott Laboratories
  Federal Circuit· 2004-07-08· cited 6×
• Boston Scientific Corp. v. Cordis Corp.
  D. Delaware· 2012-03-13· cited 5×
• Rosco, Inc. v. Mirror Lite Co.
  E.D. New York· 2009-06-17· cited 4×

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.
  Supreme Court· 1996-04-29· cited 3,226×
• Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1995-04-05· cited 2,940×
• Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 1998-03-25· cited 1,536×
• Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.
  Supreme Court· 1997-03-03· cited 1,430×
• Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.
  Supreme Court· 2002-05-28· cited 669×
• Carl B. Bai v. L & L Wings, Inc., D/B/A Wings, and Great World Co. Of New York Ltd., and Elufa Fashions, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1998-11-03· cited 407×
• Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 1978-04-25· cited 369×
• Micro Chemical, Inc. v. Lextron, Inc. And Turnkey Computer Systems, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2003-01-24· cited 268×
• Festo Corporation v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd., A/K/A Smc Corporation, and Smc Pneumatics, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2003-11-05· cited 183×
• State Industries, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Mor-Flo Industries, Inc. And American Appliance Mfg. Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 1989-11-09· cited 180×
• Brooktree Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1993-01-04· cited 178×
• Grain Processing Corporation v. American Maize-Products Company
  Federal Circuit· 1999-08-04· cited 141×
• Moore U.S.A., Inc.,plaintiff-Appellant v. Standard Register Company,defendant-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2000-09-22· cited 128×
• Bic Leisure Products, Inc., and Windglider Fred Ostermann, Gmbh v. Windsurfing International, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant, and James R. Drake
  Federal Circuit· 1993-09-07· cited 126×
• Elekta Instrument S.A. v. O.U.R. Scientific International, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2000-06-01· cited 120×
• Southwest Software, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Harlequin Incorporated, Harlequin Limited, and Ecrm Trust
  Federal Circuit· 2000-09-18· cited 71×
• Sextant Avionique, S.A. v. Analog Devices, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Appellant
  Federal Circuit· 1999-02-26· cited 70×
• Crystal Semiconductor Corp. v. Tritech Microelectronics International, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2001-03-07· cited 61×
• Innovad Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2001-08-06· cited 43×

Other cases named Ericsson, Inc. v. Harris Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Ericsson, Inc. v. Harris Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2002-12-19