Skip to main content
· 1/4/1993

Brooktree Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

Citations

  • 977 F.2d 1555

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that price erosion losses, when reasonably related to the infringing activity, may accrue before the infringement has been verified or proved in court
  • explaining that the presumption of validity for issued patents is “based in part on the expertise of patent examiners [who are] presumed to have done their job”
  • recognizing the • highly factual nature of the new matter inquiry
  • summarizing relevant statements from the legislative history discussing reverse engineering and paper trails
  • summarizing relevant statements from the legislative history discussing reverse engineering and paper trails
  • summarizing relevant statements from the legislative history discussing reverse engineering and paper trails

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Michel, Rader

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.