Southwest Software, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Harlequin Incorporated, Harlequin Limited, and Ecrm Trust

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Eagle Iron Works was not binding and declining to accept it as persuasive
• remanding the case for the district court to consider whether the claim-in-suit was invalid before the certificate of correction was issued
• stating that \it does not seem to us to be asking too much to expect a patentee to check a patent when it is issued in order to determine whether it contains any errors that require the issuance of a certificate of correction\
• “Failing to properly move for JMOL at the close of the evidence precludes a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence underlying fact findings.”
• “Failing to properly move for JMOL at the close of the evidence precludes a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence underlying fact findings.”
• “for causes of action arising after the PTO issues a certificate of correction ... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).