Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 9/5/1990
Marks v. State
Citations
- 578 A.2d 828
- 84 Md. App. 269
- 1990 Md. App. LEXIS 146
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that delay caused by continuance requested by a codefendant was chargeable to the state because the state elected to try the defendant and codefendant jointly
- holding that [Wright] waived his speedy trial right where he only raised the Hicks issue at trial
- “[T]he benefits that the rule confers upon defendants are 6 In 1979, for instance, the Hicks Rule was changed from a 120-Day Rule into a 180-Day Rule. 23 incidental.”
- \The purpose of the 180 day rule is to protect the societal interest in the prompt trial of criminal cases; the benefits that the rule confers upon defendants are incidental.\ (Citation omitted).
- joint request for continuance is neutral and not chargeable to either party
- \[T]he benefits that the rule confers upon defendants are incidental.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moylan, Karwacki, Getty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Klauenberg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-08-25· cited 143×
- Oken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-06-13· cited 110×
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-10-20· cited 47×
- Tapscott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-08-31· cited 36×
- Hagez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-05-30· cited 32×
- Lloyd v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-09-04· cited 30×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-10-06· cited 29×
- Icgoren v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-02-10· cited 29×
- Howell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-05-02· cited 27×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-05-20· cited 22×
- Ruth v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-01· cited 13×
- State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-02-14· cited 13×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-08· cited 11×
- Dalton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-06-26· cited 9×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-08-31· cited 8×
- GOLDRING & LYLES v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-04-18· cited 6×
- Butler v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-11-01· cited 6×
- Henry v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-04-25· cited 3×
- State v. BarberCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-02-06· cited 2×
- Jackson v. State State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-08-14· cited 2×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-02-07· cited 159×
- Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-04-01· cited 149×
- Thomas v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1985-03-25· cited 119×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-10-31· cited 113×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-09-16· cited 105×
- Cross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-05-04· cited 104×
- McKnight v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-07-06· cited 101×
- Lodowski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-08-22· cited 91×
- Epps v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-10-06· cited 89×
- Couser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-03-10· cited 87×
- Grandison v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1986-10-06· cited 75×
- Lodowski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-03-24· cited 74×
- State v. GeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-02-23· cited 62×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-12-14· cited 60×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-11-10· cited 58×
- Holbrook v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-03-11· cited 55×
- Straughn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-10-07· cited 53×
- Frazier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-02-14· cited 46×
- Couser v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-06-13· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.