New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 12/20/2004
Epperson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Citations
- 373 N.J. Super. 522
- 862 A.2d 1156
- 22 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 129
- 2004 N.J. Super. LEXIS 447
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that damages related to loss of present or prospective employment which can be proved with reasonable certainty to have been caused by the prosecution are recoverable
- noting that damages related to loss of present or prospective employment which can be proved with reasonable certainty to have been caused by the prosecution are recoverable
- stating that instituting a criminal action requirement “may be met by proof that defendant took ‘some active part in instigating or encouraging the prosecution’” (quoting Prosser and Keeton, The Law of Torts § 119 at 872 (5th ed., 1984)) (cleaned up
- rejecting argument that defendant did not initiate a criminal proceeding because they did not sign the criminal complaint
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fisher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dolson v. AnastasiaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1969-11-17· cited 601×
- Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-07-28· cited 501×
- Woolley v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1985-05-09· cited 287×
- Erickson v. Marsh & McLennan Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-02-05· cited 234×
- Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama· 1987-07-10· cited 182×
- Mehlman v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-03-26· cited 140×
- Lind v. SchmidSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1975-04-30· cited 109×
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1951-08-10· cited 98×
- The Penwag Property Co., Inc. v. LandauSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1978-07-10· cited 98×
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1952-06-16· cited 74×
- Hinrichs v. Tranquilaire HospitalSupreme Court of Alabama· 1977-12-16· cited 73×
- Hodges v. Gibson Products Co.Utah Supreme Court· 1991-04-03· cited 66×
- Voytko v. Ramada Inn of Atlantic CityD. New Jersey· 1978-01-31· cited 48×
- Bernard v. IMI Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-01-25· cited 38×
- Giudice v. Drew Chemical Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-04-24· cited 36×
- Seidel v. GREENBERGNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1969-12-24· cited 32×
- Morales v. BusbeeD. New Jersey· 1997-06-20· cited 27×
- Meredith v. C.E. Walther, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1982-09-17· cited 22×
- Vladar v. KlopmanSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1916-11-20· cited 13×
- Myrick v. RESORTS INTERN. CASINO & HOTELNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-03-22· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.