Skip to main content

Epperson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Citations

  • 373 N.J. Super. 522
  • 862 A.2d 1156
  • 22 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 129
  • 2004 N.J. Super. LEXIS 447

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that damages related to loss of present or prospective employment which can be proved with reasonable certainty to have been caused by the prosecution are recoverable
  • noting that damages related to loss of present or prospective employment which can be proved with reasonable certainty to have been caused by the prosecution are recoverable
  • stating that instituting a criminal action requirement “may be met by proof that defendant took ‘some active part in instigating or encouraging the prosecution’” (quoting Prosser and Keeton, The Law of Torts § 119 at 872 (5th ed., 1984)) (cleaned up
  • rejecting argument that defendant did not initiate a criminal proceeding because they did not sign the criminal complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.