· 11/20/1916
Vladar v. Klopman
Citations
- 89 N.J.L. 575
- 4 Gummere 575
- 99 A. 330
- 1916 N.J. LEXIS 344
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a finding that defendants had “[a]ctual notice of an action militates against a finding of prejudice”
- “[E]xpiration of the statute of limitations does not require a court to use its discretion to grant an extension of time for service in every time-barred case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gummere
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.