Skip to main content
· 11/20/1916

Vladar v. Klopman

Citations

  • 89 N.J.L. 575
  • 4 Gummere 575
  • 99 A. 330
  • 1916 N.J. LEXIS 344

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a finding that defendants had “[a]ctual notice of an action militates against a finding of prejudice”
  • “[E]xpiration of the statute of limitations does not require a court to use its discretion to grant an extension of time for service in every time-barred case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gummere

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.