Ensley v. Cody Resources, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Rule 17(a) addresses prudential standing limitation
• a defendant’s “incantation that a shareholder may not sue for the corporation’s injury does not attack [a plaintiff's] injury in fact”
• “Although the EPA correctly points out that we have previously considered the issue [of prudential standing] sua sponte, ... we decline to do so here.” (citation omitted)
• the limitation on third party standing is prudential and subject to forfeiture
• “Ensley and his wife face a significant diminution in the value of their shares.”
• Rule 17(a) objection waived when it was raised too late

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).