Zurich Insurance Company v. Logitrans, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, without standing, a plaintiff cannot “bring [an] action” or “make a motion to sub- stitute the real party in interest”
• stating that, without standing, a plaintiff cannot “bring [an] action” or “make a motion to sub- stitute the real party in interest”
• plaintiff that ʺhad no standing to bring th[e] action [had] no standing to make a motion to substitute the real party in interestʺ
• because the Federal Rules “cannot expand the subject matter jurisdiction of federal courts beyond the limits of [the] U.S. Constitution . . . [Rule 17(a
• when lawyer incorrectly named wrong entity as plaintiff, and that entity “had no claims whatsoever against the defendants, and no Article III standing to sue,” Rule 17 did not permit substitution of correct entity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).