Enmon v. Prospect Capital Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that § 1927 permits an award “against the firm as a whole for the actions of various lawyers” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that “sanctions may be warranted even where bad-faith conduct does not disrupt the litigation before the sanctioning court”
• concluding that § 1927 permits an award “against the firm as a whole for the actions of various lawyers” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• finding that \sanctions may be warranted even where bad-faith conduct does not disrupt the litigation before the sanctioning court\
• noting that evidence that the moving party “had known about . . . for over a year” was neither new nor newly discovered
• noting that evidence that the moving party “had known about . . . for over a year” was neither new nor newly discovered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).