Skip to main content
· 8/30/1988

Apex Oil Company v. The Belcher Company of New York, Inc. And Belcher New Jersey, Inc., Shea & Gould

Citations

  • 855 F.2d 1009
  • 11 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1382
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11920
  • 1988 WL 90486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming award of sanctions on defendant for failing to comply with the plaintiff’s reasonable discovery requests on three separate occasions
  • affirming determination that denial by defendant was unjustified and remanding for calculation of sanctions
  • in interpreting and applying Rule 26(g), courts look to case law and standards under Rule 11
  • while a court use Rule 11 as a cost shifting measure, “Rule 11 does not require an award of actual fees.”
  • it is within the district court’s discretion of determine whether the parties have complied with Rule 37(a)(1)’s meet and confer requirement
  • it is within the district court's discretion to determine whether the parties have complied with Rule 37(a)(1)’s meet and confer requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Timbers, Winter, Altimari

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.