Skip to main content

Cofield v. State

Citations

  • 274 S.E.2d 530
  • 247 Ga. 98
  • 1981 Ga. LEXIS 633

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defense counsel's further questioning of juror on Witherspoon issue allowed, but not questions outside scope of Witherspoon's holding
  • defense counsel’s further questioning of juror on Witherspoon issue allowed, but not questions outside scope of Witherspoon’s holding
  • defendant failed to proffer evidence to show that the victim was homosexual as a predicate to alleging that victim was killed in a lover’s quarrel
  • wherein the trial court itself made no clear determination of the disputed issue of voluntariness, merely a determination that the State’s evidence alone had made a prima facie showing of voluntariness
  • wherein the trial court itself made no clear determination of the disputed issue of voluntariness, merely a determination that the State's evidence alone had made a prima facie showing of voluntariness
  • failure to instruct jury on elements of crime constituting aggravating circumstance is not error where jury is instructed on elements during the guilt phase of the trial and defendant is found guilty of that offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Jordan, Marshall, Gregory

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.