District of Columbia· 10/30/2007
Majhor v. Kempthorne
Citations
- 518 F. Supp. 2d 221
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80113
- 2007 WL 3171818
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that plaintiff cannot establish personal jurisdiction over government officials of American Samoa under the District’s long-arm statute
- holding that without “actual knowledge” of the plaintiff’s injuries, the defendants “could not have deliberately sought to withhold care for a serious medical need or ignored [the plaintiff’s] requests for medical care” (quoting Arnold v. Moore, 980 F. Supp. 28, 34 (D.D.C. 1997
- stating that “a Bivens action may be maintained against a defendant only in his or her individual capacity, and not in his or her official capacity”
- denying motion for sanctions absent prior opportunity to respond or correct conduct
- “a Bivens action may be maintained against a defendant only in his or her individual capacity, and not in his or her official capacity”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reggie B. Walton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Scinto v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict of Columbia· 2009-03-30· cited 30×
- Agudas Chasidei Chabad of United States v. Russian FederationDistrict of Columbia· 2011-07-26· cited 26×
- Mullen v. Bureau of PrisonsDistrict of Columbia· 2012-02-21· cited 23×
- Ramer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2009-06-02· cited 18×
- Kim v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2009-05-26· cited 17×
- Barroca v. HurwitzD.C. Circuit· 2018-09-28· cited 6×
- Sandy v. ConnellyDistrict of Columbia· 2010-08-30
- Salcedo v. RossottiDistrict of Columbia· 2009-07-20
- Ramer v. United States GovernmentDistrict of Columbia· 2009-06-02
- Barroca v. SamuelsDistrict of Columbia· 2018-09-28
- Woodruff v. United States of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2020-06-18
- Pincus Hueter v. KruseDistrict of Columbia· 2022-03-18
- Curne v. Small Business AdministrationDistrict of Columbia· 2024-12-10
Cites
62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 28,443×
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 14,568×
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 9,657×
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-24· cited 6,491×
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court· 1997-12-15· cited 6,055×
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court· 1994-02-23· cited 4,884×
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court· 1941-03-03· cited 3,480×
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1999-05-17· cited 3,295×
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 3,061×
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 2,854×
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court· 1997-06-16· cited 2,432×
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1943-06-21· cited 2,418×
- Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court· 2004-03-02· cited 2,198×
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 2,158×
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court· 1974-02-19· cited 1,904×
- Correctional Services Corp. v. MaleskoSupreme Court· 2001-11-27· cited 1,854×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.