Rosecan v. Springer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing an award of alimony where “the numbers and findings [did] not add up to” the amount the court awarded in permanent periodic alimony
• “Absent special circumstances which do not appear in the judgment, an alimony award should not exceed a spouse’s need.”
• “Absent special circumstances ..., an alimony award should not exceed a spouse’s need.”
• “Absent special circumstances ..., an alimony award should not exceed a spouse’s need.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).