Skip to main content
· 12/23/1993

Elbert v. Howmedica, Inc.

Citations

  • 841 F. Supp. 327
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18177
  • 1993 WL 535198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that' MDA and underlying FDA regulations did not preempt state tort claims allegedly caused by the same prosthetic knee device at issue in the case at bar
  • since Class II devices \do not have nearly as extensive requirements imposed upon them\ as Class III devices, preemption does not apply for Class II devices absent regulation other than identification regulation
  • since Class II devices “do not have nearly as extensive requirements imposed upon them” as Class III devices, preemption does not apply for Class II devices absent regulation other than identification regulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kurren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.