Skip to main content
· 2/20/2009

Horowitz v. Stryker Corp.

Citations

  • 613 F. Supp. 2d 271
  • 68 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 64
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13321
  • 2009 WL 436406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claims are preempted absent “a cognizable link between the defendant’s federal violations and plaintiff’s injury”
  • determining that a claim based on CGMP requirement are “simply too generic, standing alone” to form the basis for a parallel claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trager

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.