· 1/10/1995
Federal Case
Citations
- 44 F.3d 806
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- contrasting more extensive requirements for Class III devices than for Class II devices
- no preemption with respect to Class II jaw prosthesis subject only to identification regulation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.