Skip to main content
· 1/10/1995

Federal Case

Citations

  • 44 F.3d 806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • contrasting more extensive requirements for Class III devices than for Class II devices
  • no preemption with respect to Class II jaw prosthesis subject only to identification regulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.