Elam v. Barnhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling the claimant's impairments were not disabling or that treatment may restore the claimant's ability to work therefore the ALJ did not need to determine claimant’s reason for failure to follow prescribed treatment
• mapping an analytical framework for judicial review of a pro se action challenging an adverse administrative decision, including: (1) examining whether the SSA’s decision generally comports with regulations, (2
• mapping an analytical framework for judicial review of a pro se action challenging an adverse administrative decision, including: (1) examining whether the SSA’s decision generally comports with regulations, (2
• mapping an analytical framework for judicial review of a pro se action challenging an adverse administrative decision, including: (1) examining whether the Commissioner’s decision generally comports with regulations, (2
• mapping an analytical framework for judicial review of a pro se action challenging an adverse administrative decision, including: (1) examining whether the SSA’s decision generally comports with regulations, (2
• mapping an analytical framework for judicial review of a pro se action challenging an adverse administrative decision, including: (1) examining whether the SSA’s decision generally comports with regulations, (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Washington v. Barnhart
  E.D. Texas· 2006-01-06· cited 13×

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Richardson v. Perales
  Supreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 22,864×
• Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
  Supreme Court· 1938-12-05· cited 12,026×
• Bowen v. Yuckert
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-08· cited 9,437×
• Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association
  Fifth Circuit· 1996-03-28· cited 8,052×
• Heckler v. Campbell
  Supreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 1,893×
• United States v. James C. Dunkel
  Seventh Circuit· 1991-03-08· cited 1,563×
• National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.
  Supreme Court· 1939-02-27· cited 828×
• Malacara v. Garber
  Fifth Circuit· 2003-12-12· cited 760×
• Don E. LEGGETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley E. CHATER, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee
  Fifth Circuit· 1995-10-30· cited 563×
• Elizabeth Anthony v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary Health and Human Services
  Fifth Circuit· 1992-02-25· cited 449×
• Roberts v. Shalala
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-09-14· cited 449×
• Curtis SELDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee
  Fifth Circuit· 1990-09-07· cited 444×
• Benito RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee
  Fifth Circuit· 1988-10-14· cited 441×
• Carol A. HOLLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee
  Fifth Circuit· 1988-02-25· cited 364×
• Pete FALCO, SSN 452-44-9336, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee
  Fifth Circuit· 1994-07-29· cited 286×
• Isiah Morris v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services
  Fifth Circuit· 1988-10-25· cited 215×
• Claudie F. Jones v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services
  Fifth Circuit· 1983-04-14· cited 111×
• Luis Chico v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services
  Second Circuit· 1983-06-27· cited 108×
• Ramon CHAPARRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee
  Fifth Circuit· 1987-03-27· cited 106×
• Shawn A. Holley v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
  Eighth Circuit· 2001-06-15· cited 87×