Fifth Circuit· 12/12/2003

Malacara v. Garber

Citations

353 F.3d 393
2003 WL 22890688

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that evidence that was not referred to in non-movant’s opposition to summary judgment was not properly before the district court on summary judgment and would not be considered on appeal
emphasizing that TWC did not do these things and so did not engage in recruiting
explaining that courts will not sift through the record to identify the specific evidence supporting a party’s contention
acknowledging that a district court may grant summary judgment sua sponte so long as the losing party had notice that he had to come forward with all of his evidence
stating that “[w]hen evidence exists in the summary judgment record but the nonmovant fails even to refer to it in the response to the motion for summary judgment, that evidence is not properly before the district court”
stating that “[w]hen evidence exists in the summary judgment record but the nonmovant fails even to refer to it in the response to the motion for summary judgment, that evidence is not properly before the district court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jolly, Wiener, Rosenthal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

130 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.