Carol A. HOLLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the absence of objective factors can justify the conclusion that a witness lacks credibility
• explaining that the claimant-appellant “misframed” the issue when she argued that had the ALJ recognized that her impairments caused pain, he would have found that her pain was disabling
• stating that the “relevant law and regulations governing the determination of disability under a claim for disability insurance benefits are identical to those governing the determination under a claim for [SSI]”
• stating the “relevant law and regulations governing the determination of disability under a claim for [DIB] are identical to those governing the determination under a claim for [SSI]”
• stating the “relevant law and regulations governing the determination of disability under a claim for [DIB] are identical to those governing the determination under a claim for [SSI]”
• “Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept to support a conclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).