District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/12/2001
Lopez v. Lopez
Citations
- 780 So. 2d 164
- 2001 WL 27863
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that an award of attorney’s fees to the wife was improper when “the parties’ financial positions ... were equalized through the award of alimony and equitable distribution of marital assets”
- holding that an order requiring a party to purchase life insurance to secure a support obligation must have the requisite evidentiary basis, and reversing for further proceedings to reevaluate the life insurance requirement set forth to secure child support obligations
- noting that “there may be an insurability question” because the former husband had previously had an artificial heart valve inserted
- noting that the fact that the wife had “additional non-marital assets that enable her to retain competent counsel” was further support for the court’s determination that requiring the husband to contribute to the wife’s attorney’s fees was an abuse of discretion
- reversing the award of attorney’s fees to the wife “[b]ecause the parties’ financial positions here were equalized through the award of alimony and equitable distribution of marital assets”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Casanueva
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Levy v. LevyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-29· cited 32×
- Cozier v. CozierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-08· cited 24×
- Zangari v. CunninghamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-19· cited 15×
- Guerin v. DiRomaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-06-26· cited 15×
- Forgione v. ForgioneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-21· cited 10×
- Baker v. BakerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-12· cited 9×
- Wight v. WightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-28· cited 8×
- Hanson v. HansonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-04-28· cited 8×
- Bracero v. BraceroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-13· cited 6×
- Rufus Hutchinson v. Hattie P. HutchinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-10-20· cited 4×
- Brady v. BradyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-09· cited 3×
- Eisele v. EiseleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-25· cited 3×
- Arthur v. ArthurDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-25· cited 2×
- Scalabroni v. ScalabroniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-22· cited 2×
- Cissel v. CisselDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-22· cited 2×
- Shulstad v. ShulstadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-05-25· cited 1×
- LISA KIM KARKHOFF v. THOMAS ANTHONY ROBILOTTADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-12-09
- Christina Fano Schultheis v. Milan SchultheisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-10-29
- Christina Fano Schultheis v. Milan SchultheisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-02-25
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
- Rosen v. RosenSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-24· cited 318×
- Milo v. MiloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-25· cited 15×
- Jacoby v. JacobyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-26· cited 13×
- Zimmerman v. ZimmermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-09· cited 6×
- Knight v. KnightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-10-06· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.