Ninth Circuit· 2/9/1970
Edwin Nathaniel Gebhard v. United States
Citations
- 422 F.2d 281
- 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10793
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “If [defendant] in fact told separate lies, each of which could have hindered the grand jury in its investigation, then he could properly be separately charged for each lie.”
- “[W]e do not think it proper that the government bludgeon a witness who is lying by repeating and rephrasing the same question, thus creating more possible perjury counts.”
- separate lies that hindered grand jury in its investigation could each be separately charged
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chambers, Duniway, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. ZadraColorado Court of Appeals· 2013-10-24· cited 393×
- United States v. Bernard James SeeNinth Circuit· 1975-03-24· cited 120×
- Winston B. Lewy v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyNinth Circuit· 1986-09-12· cited 87×
- United States v. Dwight L. ChapinD.C. Circuit· 1975-07-14· cited 83×
- United States v. Martin SweigSecond Circuit· 1971-06-21· cited 82×
- State v. NealSupreme Court of Missouri· 1974-09-09· cited 72×
- United States v. Clayton BerardiSecond Circuit· 1980-11-17· cited 65×
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against HuddlestonWashington Supreme Court· 1999-04-08· cited 60×
- Hsu v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-09-29· cited 56×
- United States v. George Raymond DippNinth Circuit· 1978-09-19· cited 48×
- United States v. William E. DoulinSecond Circuit· 1976-06-21· cited 46×
- United States v. Edward Sinclair WilliamsEighth Circuit· 1977-03-23· cited 44×
- United States v. Rick De La TorreFifth Circuit· 1981-01-19· cited 43×
- United States v. Joann WigganNinth Circuit· 2012-11-20· cited 43×
- United States v. Michael James OlsowyNinth Circuit· 1988-01-04· cited 39×
- United States v. Vapsi Akiram Salas-CamachoNinth Circuit· 1988-10-19· cited 34×
- United States v. ClarridgeDistrict of Columbia· 1992-12-10· cited 33×
- United States v. Katherine J. Segall, A/k/a: Katherine J. CoadyNinth Circuit· 1987-11-23· cited 32×
- United States v. Ojiabo Ifeanyi OnumonuSecond Circuit· 1993-07-13· cited 31×
- United States v. Saul KopelSeventh Circuit· 1977-04-19· cited 30×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-03-08· cited 3,183×
- United States v. DebrowSupreme Court· 1953-11-30· cited 454×
- Eldred J. Paternostro v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1962-12-27· cited 112×
- Orzell Billingsley, Sr., C. Herbert Oliver, J. S. Phifer and Abraham Woods, Jr. v. George W. ClaytonFifth Circuit· 1966-04-05· cited 69×
- Woolley v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1938-05-31· cited 60×
- James Arena v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1955-11-07· cited 56×
- Willie Jones v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1963-12-13· cited 44×
- Travis v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1941-11-03· cited 35×
- Local 36 of International Fishermen & Allied Workers v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1949-09-28· cited 34×
- United States v. George Sam MaginSeventh Circuit· 1960-07-25· cited 26×
- Hugh Bryson v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1959-06-22· cited 23×
- John Vuckson v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1966-02-11· cited 23×
- United States v. CobertS.D. California· 1964-03-20· cited 19×
- United States v. Joseph NicolettiSeventh Circuit· 1963-01-04· cited 17×
- Leonard Williams v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1957-02-20· cited 15×
- Frank J. McCartney v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1967-08-31· cited 13×
- Ray Pocatello v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1968-03-20· cited 12×
- Elmer James Bilderback, Jr. v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1957-12-17· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.