United States v. Michael James Olsowy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that identical false statements made to the same audience in response to identical questions cannot result in multiple convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 1001
• holding that defendant’s same oral denial about having received a Social Security check repeated two weeks later to same government agent did not further impair government operations and therefore conviction on second statement could not stand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).