United States v. Dwight L. Chapin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating a defendant’s knowledge of the falsity of statements may be inferred from “proof of the objective falsity itself ... and from other facts tending to show that the defendant really knew the things he claimed not to know or recall”
• “[P]recedent demands that the court take into account whether the publicity is sufficiently localized that potential jurors in another area would be free of any taint from exposure to the press, enabling the change to serve its purpose.”
• “[P]recedent demands that the court take into account whether the publicity is sufficiently localized that potential jurors in another area would be free of any taint from exposure to the press, enabling the change to serve its purpose.”
• “[P]recedent demands that the court take into account whether the publicity is sufficiently localized that potential jurors in another area would be free of any taint from exposure to the press, allowing the change to serve its purpose.”
• “[P]recedent demands that the court take into account whether the publicity is sufficiently localized that potential jurors in another area would be free of any taint from exposure to the press, allowing the 6 change to serve its purpose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).