United States v. Vapsi Akiram Salas-Camacho

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a statement is “materially false” if it is capable of influencing the government agency’s operations, and that the statement need not actually influence the agency
• explaining that a statement is “materially false” if it is capable of influencing the government agency’s operations, and that the statement need not actually influence the agency
• noting that this Court has never dealt with such situation
• noting that this Court has never dealt with such situation
• distin- guishing Cowden and declining to find false statements immaterial when defendant corrected statements only No. 07-1381 21 when confronted by federal agents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).