Court of Appeals of Washington· 9/8/2010
Edwards v. Le Duc
Citations
- 238 P.3d 1187
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \A trial court must hold pro se parties to the same standards to which it holds attorneys.\
- trial court abused its discretion by denying defendant’s motion for new trial where the court repeatedly assisted the pro se plaintiff during trial rather than treating her as it would a lawyer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Deren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Oliver L. Wuth v. Valley Medical Center And LabcorCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-08-24· cited 15×
- PACIFICORP ENVT'L v. Dept. of Transp.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-07-19· cited 6×
- PacifiCorp Environmental Remediation Co. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-07-19· cited 6×
- Harrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-08-28· cited 5×
- State Of Washington v. Sayiden H. MohamedCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-08-17· cited 3×
- Aho Construction I, Inc. v. City Of MoxeeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-12-06· cited 2×
- 1930 Llc, V. Terry JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2025-03-11
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Holland v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-03-27· cited 265×
- Holland v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-05-22· cited 245×
- HJS Development, Inc. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2003-01-23· cited 121×
- Westberg v. All-Purpose Structures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-05-09· cited 75×
- Richards v. Overlake Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-09-17· cited 71×
- State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court· 1915-01-11· cited 60×
- Westberg v. All-Purpose Structures Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-06-13· cited 58×
- US West Communications, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 56×
- State v. CrottsWashington Supreme Court· 1900-03-10· cited 52×
- State v. JackmanWashington Supreme Court· 1989-12-14· cited 48×
- Edwards v. Le DucCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-07-07· cited 46×
- Lian v. StalickCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-19· cited 45×
- Jankelson v. CiselCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1970-08-03· cited 27×
- Brister v. Tacoma City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-10-21· cited 16×
- Bolte v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1899-07-01· cited 14×
- Carver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-11-25· cited 9×
- Schneider v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-09-17· cited 8×
- Marvik v. WinkelmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-02-23· cited 7×
- Marvik v. WinkelmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-03-30· cited 5×
- Bolte v. Third Avenue R. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1899-03-17· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.