Carver v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In order to prevail on a claim of collateral estoppel, the party seeking application of the doctrine bears the burden....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Edwards v. Le Duc
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-07-07· cited 46×
• Edwards v. Le Duc
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-09-08· cited 34×
• Beres v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2010-04-12· cited 6×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lybbert v. Grant County
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-06-08· cited 365×
• Christensen v. Grant County Hospital District No. 1
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-08-26· cited 195×
• Reninger v. State Dept. of Corrections
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-02-26· cited 98×
• Reninger v. Department of Corrections
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-02-26· cited 96×
• Batten v. Abrams
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-04-08· cited 78×
• Luisi Truck Lines, Inc. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission
  Washington Supreme Court· 1967-12-28· cited 50×
• Davis v. City of Charleston
  Eighth Circuit· 1987-08-25· cited 24×
• Gareth West v. John Ruff, Mike Drum, Mike Perry and Matthew Cronin
  Second Circuit· 1992-04-23· cited 20×
• Cruz v. Root
  W.D. New York· 1996-07-09· cited 9×
• Clark v. Department of Correctional Services
  S.D. New York· 1983-06-08· cited 8×
• Christensen v. Grant County Hosp. Dist.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-08-31· cited 8×