Court of Appeals of Washington· 5/9/1997
Westberg v. All-Purpose Structures, Inc.
Citations
- 86 Wash. App. 405
- 936 P.2d 1175
- 1997 Wash. App. LEXIS 723
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Pro se litigants are “bound by the same rules of procedure and substantive law as attorneys.”
- “Pro se litigants are bound by the same rules of procedure and substantive laws as attorneys.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1997-12-04· cited 149×
- Holder v. City of VancouverCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-12-05· cited 63×
- Westberg v. All-Purpose Structures Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-06-13· cited 58×
- Godfrey v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 2001-01-25· cited 53×
- Godfrey v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court· 2001-01-25· cited 52×
- Edwards v. Le DucCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-07-07· cited 46×
- Kim v. PhamCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-04-19· cited 38×
- Kim v. PhamCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-05-21· cited 35×
- Edwards v. Le DucCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-09-08· cited 34×
- Carpenter v. ElwayCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-11-19· cited 21×
- Wesco Distribution, Inc. v. M.A. Mortenson Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-11-10· cited 12×
- Bellevue School Dist. v. ESCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-01-12· cited 11×
- Bellevue School District v. E.S.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-01-12· cited 10×
- Odyssey Healthcare Operating Blp v. State, Dept. of HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-06-17· cited 9×
- Newton v. LegarskyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-09-17· cited 9×
- Cascade Floral Prod., Inc. v. Dep. of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-01-15· cited 8×
- Cascade Floral Products, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-01-15· cited 8×
- In Re MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-12-24· cited 6×
- Martin v. Criminal Justice Training CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-12-24· cited 6×
- Haywood v. ArandaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-10-29· cited 5×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1989-09-27· cited 308×
- Christie-Lambert Van & Storage Co. v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-12-24· cited 60×
- Federal Signal Corp. v. Safety Factors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1994-12-15· cited 60×
- Ford Motor Co. v. BarrettWashington Supreme Court· 1990-11-15· cited 48×
- In Re the Marriage of HansenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-04-30· cited 27×
- Patterson v. Superintendent of Public InstructionCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-12-20· cited 27×
- O'NEILL v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-03-30· cited 20×
- Swanson v. MayCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-03-28· cited 19×
- Lumber Mart Co. v. BuchananWashington Supreme Court· 1966-11-03· cited 18×
- Fernandes v. MockridgeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-08-01· cited 12×
- State v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-06-13· cited 9×
- State v. MottetWashington Supreme Court· 1968-01-25· cited 6×
- Trowbridge v. WalshCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-05-24· cited 4×
Other cases named Westberg v. All-Purpose Structures, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.