District Court of Appeal of Florida· 11/12/2013
Smith v. State
Citations
- 125 So. 3d 359
- 2013 WL 5988609
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17968
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the knowledge element of constructive possession may be inferred from evidence that contraband was located in plain view
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benton, Nortwick, Padovano
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McDuffie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-11-21· cited 161×
- State v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-11-23· cited 39×
- Sundin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-15· cited 18×
- J.S.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-08· cited 15×
- Edmond v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-22· cited 12×
- Wade v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-03-05· cited 10×
- Edison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-06· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.