· 9/18/1980
Edmond G. Pharo v. W. L. Smith
Citations
- 625 F.2d 1226
- 30 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 397
- 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 13945
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- motion to amend denied because filed nine months after a motion for summary judgment
- motion to amend denied because filed nine months after a motion for summary judgment
- “That a plaintiff’s state law claim will be time barred if dismissed is certainly a factor, if not a determinative factor, a district court should consider in deciding whether to maintain jurisdiction over pendent state claims. . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Simpson, Tjoflat, Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.