Skip to main content
· 4/9/1984

In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.

Citations

  • 583 F. Supp. 1388
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17796

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adopting Baselski language as limitation on strictness with which particularity requirement to be applied
  • “unless they have been diligent record keepers, plaintiffs may lack, pre-discovery, detailed information necessary to list all transactions or calculate turnover ratios. The records containing that information are most likely in the possession of defendants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Giles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.