Overseas Inns S.A. P.A. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that U.S. courts consistently recognize foreign courts’ interest in winding up the affairs of their domestic business entities
• denying leave to amend where plaintiff waited two and a half years after suing and two years after defendant filed summary judgment
• upholding a denial of leave to amend when a summary judgment motion had been filed and the case had been pending for over two years
• affirming a 9 district court’s denial of a motion to amend that was clearly brought to avoid summary 10 judgment
• “A party should not, without adequate grounds, be permitted to avoid summary judgment by the expedient of amending its complaint.”
• “A party should not, without adequate grounds, be permitted to avoid sum mary judgment by the expedient of amending its complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).