New Jersey Court of Chancery· 7/22/1907
Edison v. Edison Polyform & Manufacturing Co.
Citations
- 73 N.J. Eq. 136
- 3 Buchanan 136
- 67 A. 392
- 1907 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 49
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- enjoining a third party from using the name or likeness of inventor Thomas Edison to promote its own products
- enjoining a company from using the name or likeness of Thomas Edison to promote its products
- enjoining a third party from using the name or likeness of inventor Thomas Edison to promote its own products
- “It is certain that a man in public life may not claim the same immunity from publicity that a private citizen may.”
- involving use of plaintiff's photograph on defendant's medicinal product
- “[I]t is difficult to understand why the peculiar cast of one’s features is not ... one’s property, and why its pecuniary value, if it has one, does not belong to its owner, rather than to the person seeking to make an unauthorized use of it.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stevens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lugosi v. Universal PicturesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-12-03· cited 114×
- Estate of Presley v. RussenD. New Jersey· 1981-04-16· cited 97×
- Albert Ettore v. Philco Television Broadcasting Corporation, Clayton, Inc. & Chesebrough Manufacturing Company, ConsolidatedThird Circuit· 1956-03-03· cited 82×
- Fairfield v. American Photocopy Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal· 1955-12-20· cited 73×
- Hart v. Electronic Arts, Inc.Third Circuit· 2013-05-21· cited 49×
- Canessa v. Kislak, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1967-10-19· cited 49×
- Palmer v. Schonhorn Enterprises, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1967-07-05· cited 44×
- McFarland v. MillerThird Circuit· 1994-01-25· cited 42×
- Peay v. Curtis Pub. Co.District of Columbia· 1948-06-07· cited 36×
- Themo v. New England Newspaper Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1940-05-27· cited 36×
- Thayer v. Worcester Post Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1933-10-16· cited 20×
- NOC, INC. v. SchaeferNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1984-05-14· cited 16×
- Prima v. Darden Restaurants, Inc.D. New Jersey· 2000-01-12· cited 15×
- Vassar College v. Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co.W.D. Missouri· 1912-07-08· cited 12×
- Manz v. Philadelphia Brewing Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1940-12-12· cited 6×
- Steding v. BattistoniConnecticut Appellate Court· 1964-10-30· cited 6×
- Hart v. Electronic Arts, Inc.D. New Jersey· 2011-09-09· cited 5×
- Harlow v. Buno Co.Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1939-07-26· cited 3×
- Natural Footwear Ltd. v. Hart Schaffner & MarxD. New Jersey· 1983-08-18· cited 3×
- Interpace Corp. v. Lapp, Inc.D. New Jersey· 1982-11-18· cited 2×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.