Skip to main content
· 6/7/1948

Peay v. Curtis Pub. Co.

Citations

  • 78 F. Supp. 305
  • 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • invasion of privacy where photograph used without name as illustration in article on taxicab drivers
  • invasion of privacy where photograph used without name as illustration in article on taxicab drivers
  • “It is not necessary that the plaintiff’s name be mentioned in the text. The publication of a photograph or portrait of the plaintiff as part of the libelous material may be such an identification.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holtzoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.