New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 10/19/1967
Canessa v. Kislak, Inc.
Citations
- 235 A.2d 62
- 97 N.J. Super. 327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- article of family seeking home publicized with defendant's trademark
- appropriation of name or likeness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lynch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Montells v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-07-27· cited 206×
- Crump v. Beckley Newspapers, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1984-07-11· cited 201×
- Leonard C. McNemar v. The Disney Store, Inc.Third Circuit· 1996-07-31· cited 183×
- Lugosi v. Universal PicturesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-12-03· cited 114×
- Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-07-28· cited 113×
- McGrogan v. TillSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2001-05-24· cited 110×
- Estate of Presley v. RussenD. New Jersey· 1981-04-16· cited 97×
- Lothar Motschenbacher v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, a Corporation, and William Esty CompanyNinth Circuit· 1974-06-06· cited 70×
- Devlin v. GreinerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-01-28· cited 64×
- Bisbee v. John C. Conover AgencyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1982-10-20· cited 62×
- Nossen v. HoyE.D. Virginia· 1990-11-15· cited 61×
- JOHN SMITH VS. ARVIND R. DATLA, M.D.(L-1527-15, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2017-07-12· cited 57×
- Uhlaender v. HenricksenD. Minnesota· 1970-08-25· cited 51×
- Hart v. Electronic Arts, Inc.Third Circuit· 2013-05-21· cited 49×
- Castro v. NYT TELEVISIONNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2004-06-29· cited 49×
- Rumbauskas v. CantorSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-11-30· cited 42×
- McFarland v. MillerThird Circuit· 1994-01-25· cited 42×
- Lawrence v. A.S. Abell Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-05-31· cited 32×
- Lavery v. Automation Management Consultants, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1987-09-04· cited 28×
- Candebat v. FlanaganMississippi Supreme Court· 1986-04-16· cited 27×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Folsom v. MarshU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts· 1841-10-15· cited 150×
- Earl v. WinneSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1953-12-14· cited 100×
- Eick v. Perk Dog Food Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1952-06-30· cited 58×
- Vanderbilt v. MitchellSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1907-06-17· cited 58×
- Hull v. Curtis Publishing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-10-03· cited 51×
- Bernstein v. National Broadcasting CompanyDistrict of Columbia· 1955-03-17· cited 50×
- Douglas v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1912-09-27· cited 45×
- Palmer v. Schonhorn Enterprises, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1967-07-05· cited 44×
- Kunz v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas· 1918-04-06· cited 43×
- Edison v. Edison Polyform & Manufacturing Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery· 1907-07-22· cited 40×
- Corliss v. E. W. Walker Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts· 1894-11-19· cited 36×
- Olan Mills, Inc. v. DoddSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1962-01-22· cited 28×
- Corliss v. E. W. Walker Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts· 1893-08-01· cited 26×
- McLuckie v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1888-01-05· cited 25×
- Samuel v. Curtis Pub. Co.N.D. California· 1954-07-15· cited 23×
- B. J. Wolf & Sons v. New Orleans Tailor-Made Pants Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1904-06-06· cited 15×
- Wright v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1944-06-16· cited 12×
- Kearney v. Mallon Suburban Motors, Inc.New Jersey Circuit Court· 1945-02-14· cited 12×
- Oesterreicher v. Sporting Times Pub. Co.City of New York Municipal Court· 1889-04-15· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.