Palmer v. Schonhorn Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Although not referring explicitly to the First Amendment, the court discussed similar constraints on the use of a famous person’s name and likeness
• \[T]he basic and underlying theory is that a person has the right to enjoy the fruits of his own industry free from unjustified interference.\
• “[T]he basic and underlying theory is that a person has the right to enjoy the fruits of his own industry free from unjustified interference.”
• involved use of a golf player's name and likeness in connection with a golf game
• use of names of plaintiff professional golfers in connection with paperboard game
• failing to characterize right as one of property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).