· 8/2/2005
Edes v. Verizon Communications, Inc.
Citations
- 417 F.3d 133
- 35 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1577
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 15824
- 2005 WL 1805123
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the language of the plan controls when determining what benefits a plaintiff is entitled to receive
- “Granting a motion to dismiss based on a limitations defense is entirely appropriate when the pleader's allegations leave no doubt that an asserted claim is time-barred.”
- wrongful act was the act of misclassifying employees at a single time in the past
- assuming applicability in the ERISA context
- assuming applicability in the ERISA context
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Lynch, Lipez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.