Skip to main content
· 8/2/2005

Edes v. Verizon Communications, Inc.

Citations

  • 417 F.3d 133
  • 35 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1577
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 15824
  • 2005 WL 1805123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the language of the plan controls when determining what benefits a plaintiff is entitled to receive
  • “Granting a motion to dismiss based on a limitations defense is entirely appropriate when the pleader's allegations leave no doubt that an asserted claim is time-barred.”
  • wrongful act was the act of misclassifying employees at a single time in the past
  • assuming applicability in the ERISA context
  • assuming applicability in the ERISA context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Lynch, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.