Vistamar, Inc. v. Fagundo-Fagundo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statute of limitations period for a section 1983 claim seeking to redress an unlawful taking of property began to accrue on the date of the wrongful appropriation
• holding that where defendants merely failed to inform plaintiff of certain relevant records, there was no basis for concluding that they wrongfully concealed those records from plaintiff
• declining to decide the issue since the plaintiff failed to establish equitable tolling under either state or federal law
• plaintiff fails to “allege any specific facts of concealment that would have impeded an investigation at an earlier date had [the plaintiff] chosen to undertake one”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).