Skip to main content
· 5/20/2010

Gorelik v. Costin, Pa-C

Citations

  • 605 F.3d 118
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10320
  • 2010 WL 1999591

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations can only be successful when “the pleader’s allegations leave no doubt that an asserted claim is time-barred”
  • noting that a motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations can only be successful when “the pleader’s allegations leave no doubt that an asserted claim is time-barred”
  • finding that republishing an alleged disciplinary action on a website did not constitute “a continuing tort, but rather the continuing effects of an alleged harm” and thus that the continuing violation doctrine did not apply
  • three- year statute applies to § 1983 claims arising in New Hampshire
  • analyzing continuing violation doctrine in a section 1983 case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Boudin, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.