Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 6/18/2025

Edelman v. NYU Langone

Citations

  • 141 F.4th 28

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that termination is an adverse action for purposes of a Title VII discrimination claim
  • explaining that “[t]he NYCHRL and NYSHRL employ a more liberal standard” than Title VII for retaliation claims
  • noting that the New York Court of Appeals “constru[es] NYSHRL and NYCHRL claims together” following the 2019 amendment (citing Syeed v. Bloomberg L.P., 235 N.E.3d 351, 354 (N.Y. 2024))
  • “Manifest injustice exists where a jury’s verdict is wholly without legal support.” (quotation marks omitted)
  • “There is no dispute that [the plaintiff] was subjected to an adverse employment action when her employment was terminated by the failure to renew her contract.”
  • “A post-trial Rule 50(b) motion for judgment as a matter of law is properly made only if a Rule 50(a) motion for judgment as a matter of law has been made before submission of the case to the jury.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.