Brady v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a supervisor had admitted that “new employees were typically given a training period and that [plaintiff] should have been given more time to learn the job”
• recognizing that temporary or “[m]ediate’ actions…even if constituting an adverse employment action, may not lead to legally cognizable harm if by some subsequent action on the part of the employer, the employee is restored to his or her previous status”
• noting that employer must engage in interactive process to determine ability for reasonable accommodation if employer reasonably should have known employee was disabled
• awarding $400 per hour in a § 1983 ease, relying on Judge Cogan’s analysis in Gutman
• finding adverse employment action for Americans with Disabilities Act discrimination claim where employee was transferred from duties in pharmacy to collecting shopping carts and garbage in the parking lot, though this transfer “did not affect his wages or benefits”
• \A consent decree may properly be admitted to demonstrate that a defendant was aware of its legal obligations.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).