Summa v. Hofstra University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he court rejects Defendant’s objection that conditional certification was inappropriate because the class . . . required individualized factual inquiries to determine whether or not they were exempt from the FLSA.”
• certifying employees despite varying positions and functions
• certifying employees despite varying positions and functions
• certifying employees despite varying positions and functions
• certifying employees despite varying positions and functions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).