Rodriguez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing how to justify seizure under the plain-feel doctrine, an officer's testimony must establish that he immediately knew the objects in the defendant's pocket were drugs
• “The State has the burden of proving that the officer had the requisite probable cause. It must present more evidence than just the officer’s statement he had a ‘feeling’ based on ‘experience’ that the object he felt was contraband.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• E.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-25· cited 30×
• Tarver v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-07-27· cited 6×
• State v. Witherspoon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-24· cited 5×
• Santiago v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-11· cited 5×
• Conyers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-06· cited 3×
• EB v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-25

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Minnesota v. Dickerson
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
• Doctor v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-03-12· cited 99×
• State v. J.D.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-10· cited 13×
• Cole v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-10· cited 12×