Angaran v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a person's request to an undercover officer for rolling papers so he could \roll a joint\ did not establish probable cause to believe he was in possession of marijuana because it gave rise merely to competing inferences, one criminal and one not
• holding that a person’s request to an undercover officer for rolling papers so he could “roll a joint” did not establish probable cause to believe he was in possession of marijuana because it gave rise merely to competing inferences, one criminal and one not
• reversing denial of motion to suppress and holding that the State failed to meet its burden of establishing the basis for a warrantless search when the record revealed no reasonable basis to believe detainee was armed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).