Skip to main content

Parker v. State

Citations

  • 676 N.E.2d 1083
  • 1997 Ind. App. LEXIS 61
  • 1997 WL 55413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the “general rule is that a client is bound by his attorney’s actions in civil proceedings”
  • finding no violation of Parker's rights despite no evidence having been presented as his counsel admitted that he had failed to report to the probation department as required
  • finding no violation of Parker's rights despite no evidence having been presented as his counsel admitted that he had failed to report to the probation department as required
  • “[The defendant’s] admission supports the trial court's finding that a violation occurred”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Staton, Garrard, Barteau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.